Monday, July 17, 2017

Pedestrian Death Fatality Cycling and Walking Family of elderly man fatally struck by cyclist in St Kilda, Melbourne want bikes registered and compulsory TAC Insurance WES HOSKING, Herald Sun April 21, 2017 Victoria's Cycling Strategy Focus on Increasing/ Encouraging Cycling Participation may be Negligent“Inadequate




TAC Cycling injury payouts soar to almost $50 million a year in Victoria Transport Accident Commission 

"The number of cyclists admitted to hospital has more than doubled among people aged 26 to 59"

<p>

The Age MAY 30 2014


He said the Transport Accident Commission also did not assist with medical or funeral costs for those hit by bikes because they weren’t a registered vehicle.
“There is no accountability at all,’’ Alastair said.
“What we want is for people to be aware they are potentially in control of a dangerous weapon — it is just as dangerous as a car.
“It’s also about people having some sort of recourse if something happens.



Family of elderly man fatally struck by cyclist in St Kilda want bikes registered


THE family of an elderly man fatally struck by a cyclist as he crossed the road in St Kilda has called for bicycles to be registered in the wake of the tragedy.
Norman MacKenzie, 85, was out walking his dog when hit at a pedestrian crossing on Jacka Blvd on Tuesday at about 6pm.
It is yet to be established whether the retired schoolteacher was crossing with or against traffic signals.
The cyclist, a 30-year-old man from Port Melbourne, escaped serious injury but has been left devastated.
Mr MacKenzie’s son Alastair told the Herald Sun while it was too early to know what caused the accident he hoped it would result in bikes becoming registered to make riders more accountable.
He said the Transport Accident Commission also did not assist with medical or funeral costs for those hit by bikes because they weren’t a registered vehicle.
“There is no accountability at all,’’ Alastair said.
“What we want is for people to be aware they are potentially in control of a dangerous weapon — it is just as dangerous as a car.
“It’s also about people having some sort of recourse if something happens.
“By bikes not being registered a cyclist can hit someone, get back on their bike and go and there is no way of being able to track down who that cyclist is.
“Victims of such incidents should have the same rights as anyone who is hit by a car or motorbike.
“We are trying to ensure that dad’s death has some meaning in being able to make changes.
“We can’t bring him back. But dad would have been really happy to think he could make some sort of change which was for the better. That is who he was.”
Mr MacKenzie, who was to celebrate his 60th wedding anniversary in November, was returning from taking his four-month-old staffordshire terrier to the beach when struck by the outbound road bike at the crossing in front of the ice cream kiosk near St Kilda Sea Baths.
He had almost completed crossing from the beach to the city side.
“Dad was incredibly pedantic and was training the puppy,’’ Alastair said.
“As soon they got to roads she had to sit, he would give her a treat and when it was right to go they would cross.
“My father was an incredibly fit and a very active man. He walked every day.
“He was absolutely dedicated to his family.
“Mum is devastated. They did everything together. She just can’t believe what has happened.”
Sen-Constable Nick Williams said CCTV had been of no assistance to investigations and appealed for witnesses, especially a doctor who rendered assistance, to come forward.
“As the pedestrian was crossing the road he has entered the bike lane and the cyclist has collided with him,’’ Sen-Constable Williams said.
“We don’t know whether the cyclist had a green light or a red light.
“We don’t know whether the pedestrian had a green light or a red light.”
“We know how he died we just want to know why he died — what the traffic conditions were like, what the traffic control signals were showing.
“He was attended to by a number of witnesses including an off-duty female doctor who we're particularly interested in speaking to.”
A bike fatally struck 77-year-old pedestrian James Gould further along the popular thoroughfare at Mentone in 2006.
The cyclist was fined $400 for not stopping at a red light.
Information or footage can be provided to Crime Stoppers via 1800 333 000 or crimestoppersvic.com.au
The State Government has no plans to require bikes to be registered.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/family-of-elderly-man-fatally-struck-by-cyclist-in-st-kilda-want-bikes-registered/news-story/252b4656405268e1d9fc36474f5618e4

Saturday, May 27, 2017

Cycling Safety Cycling Safely TAC Cycling injury payouts soar to almost $50 million a year in Victoria Transport Accident Commission (TAC) Victoria, Australia The Age May 30th 2014 “Cyclists are much more likely to Die from Bicycle Alone Accidents/ Bike Falls and Riding on the Footpath onto the Road or Crossing than Dooring” Pete Dowe Cycling Deaths Fatalities Risk Reduction Informed Choice Inadequate Cycling Infrastructure Victoria's Cycling Strategy Focus on Increasing/ Encouraging Cycling Participation may be Negligent“ Cyclists who break the Law are much more likely to be killed or seriously injured” Bicycle Network Victoria "Young people are being killed riding off the footpath onto the road" Bicycle Network Victoria Ride2School Ride2WorkCycling injury payouts soar to almost $50 million a year in Victoria Transport Accident Commission (TAC) Victoria, Australia The Age May 30th 2014 Cycling Safety Cycling Safely “Cyclists are much more likely to Die from Bicycle Alone Accidents/ Bike Falls and Riding on the Footpath onto the Road or Crossing than Dooring” Pete Dowe Cycling Deaths Fatalities Risk Reduction Informed Choice Inadequate Cycling Infrastructure Victoria's Cycling Strategy Focus on Increasing/ Encouraging Cycling Participation may be Negligent“ Cyclists who break the Law are much more likely to be killed or seriously injured” Bicycle Network Victoria "Young people are being killed riding off the footpath onto the road" Bicycle Network Victoria Ride2School Ride2Work


Mr MacKenzie’s son Alastair told the Herald Sun while it was too early to know what caused the accident he hoped it would result in bikes becoming registered to make riders more accountable.
He said the Transport Accident Commission also did not assist with medical or funeral costs for those hit by bikes because they weren’t a registered vehicle.
“There is no accountability at all,’’ Alastair said.
“What we want is for people to be aware they are potentially in control of a dangerous weapon — it is just as dangerous as a car.
“It’s also about people having some sort of recourse if something happens.
“By bikes not being registered a cyclist can hit someone, get back on their bike and go and there is no way of being able to track down who that cyclist is.
“Victims of such incidents should have the same rights as anyone who is hit by a car or motorbike.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/family-of-elderly-man-fatally-struck-by-cyclist-in-st-kilda-want-bikes-registered/news-story/252b4656405268e1d9fc36474f5618e4


<p>


TAC Cycling injury payouts soar to almost $50 million a year in Victoria Transport Accident Commission 

"The number of cyclists admitted to hospital has more than doubled among people aged 26 to 59"










SAVE
PRINT
LICENSE ARTICLE

Bike injury payouts soar to more than $200m a year








An increase in the number of motorcyclists and cyclists injured on Victorian roads during the past decade has led to the amount of compensation being paid out more than tripling to $203 million a year.
An analysis of Transport Accident Commission data found the number of injuries to people on motor and push bikes has risen significantly - from 1009 in 2000-01 to a high of 1337 in 2011-12.







The number of compensation claims by motorcyclists and cyclists has increased over that time at a greater rate than by other road-accident victims. At the turn of the century, one in seven claims was by a motorcyclist or cyclist. Now it is one in five.
This means the amount paid to people injured on two-wheeled transport has soared from $56 million to $203 million a year.
Experts say the increase is driven by the growing popularity of these modes of transport. The number of cyclists admitted to hospital has more than doubled among people aged 26 to 59 and the number of middle-aged male motorcyclists being injured is also up, as is the number of motorcyclist deaths.
The commission's road-safety manager, Samantha Cockfield, said the rises were linked to an increase in the popularity of recreational cycling and motorcycling among people in those age groups.
Monash Accident Research Centre associate director Stuart Newstead said cyclist injuries could be reduced through changes to roads - including more dedicated bike lanes - but that preventing motorcyclist injuries was ''a very difficult question''.
He said improved protective clothing, anti-lock brakes and stability control would reduce injuries, but riders had been reluctant to embrace new safety technology.
Independent Riders Group spokesman Damien Codognotto urged the implementation of a 2012 parliamentary inquiry into motorcycle casualties.
Motorcyclist Heather Ellis said she was ''extremely lucky'' not to have sustained serious injuries after she was involved in a crash last year.
The 50-year-old from Healesville stopped at traffic lights in Reservoir when a car slammed into the back of her. She was taken to hospital with bruising. She said protective clothing saved her.
Ms Ellis disagreed with the state government's rejection of a proposal on Monday to allow motorbike riders to weave or "filter" through slow-moving or stationary traffic and said her crash would have been avoided if filtering was allowed.
The increase in compensation to injured motorcyclists also reflects the ongoing nature of many of their injuries. Ms Cockfield said that, on average, motorcyclists and pedestrians tended to have the longest claims.
As of June 2013, 14 per cent of motorcyclist claims had been active for more than four years, she said, compared with around 10 per cent for drivers and passengers, 16 per cent for pedestrians and 7 per cent for cyclists.  

Saturday, April 29, 2017

Community Safety Bullying Female Aggression Workplace Bullying "Ms Bully" Good Weekend Sydney Mornng Herald JULY 11 2015







Ms Bully

  •  
  •  





I find it easier to get along with males in the workplace," admits Christina N. She sounds sheepish when she says this, and I'm not surprised. Christina is one of the most committed feminists I know.
Tall, stylish Gabrielle A shot to the top of her profession when she migrated to Australia as a young creative. But within a few years, she found herself relentlessly targeted by a squat, middle-aged female manager who'd clawed her way up the ranks and "didn't like any successful women". When Gabrielle objected to being shouted at in front of her workmates, she was told, "Toughen up, princess."
When Belinda L went to her manager to call out a trio of female thugs whose Mean Girls-style tactics were regularly reducing a secretary to tears, "He kept watering it down, saying, 'It must have been an accident.' " It was only later that Belinda twigged that the bullies' ringleader was having an affair with him.
Over a 30-year career, public sector lawyer Sheila K led several high-level investigations into workplace bullying and harassment. But when she herself was targeted - by a swaggering female boss she calls "the Alpha Bitch" - Sheila was blind-sided. In the end, she elected to take a redundancy rather than initiate formal proceedings. "It's a nasty process with no real outcome," she tells me with a sigh. "I would have liked to have the courage to front it. But I just didn't think it was going to get me anywhere."
"Victim" is the last word that occurs to you when you talk to women like these. They are strong, funny, articulate, insightful. They are highly regarded within their professions. Ironically, perhaps, they are also women with a strong sense of sisterhood, who genuinely like and support other women.
Yet each of them has had her career in some way ambushed by a female co-worker. And they are hardly isolated cases. Research indicates that women target other women twice as often as they do men. (Male bullies take a more equal-opportunity approach to on-the-job harassment.) And the fall-out they experience is especially toxic. Figures show that nearly nine in 10 women who are bullied by female colleagues will lose or leave their jobs as a result.
Until about 25 years ago, the term "bullying" was pretty much restricted to big kids stealing lunch money from little kids. As a category of organisational dysfunction, it's still an emerging concept. As an object of study, woman-to-woman workplace bullying is newer still.
Last year, the issue of workplace bullying was addressed in Australian law. Workers who believe they have been targeted can now apply to the Fair Work Commission for a stop order, and action can also be taken through state health and safety authorities and the Australian Human Rights Commission. Now all we need to do is figure out exactly what "workplace bullying" means. Definitions remain vague and variable, and drawing a hard line between actionable harassment and bad management can be a human-resources minefield.
Psychologist Evelyn Field, a corporate consultant and author of four books on the subject, defines bullying broadly as "an abuse of power that results in some form of injury or damage". Most experts, including Australia's Fair Work Ombudsman, stress that the key factor is a persistent pattern of behaviour that causes distress. A single incident - no matter how loud or larded with obscenities - does not a bullying charge make.
By any definition, on-the-job bullying appears to be a growth industry. Tectonic economic shifts - all of which boil down to the fact that people don't have jobs for life any more - are probably the main culprit. But researchers also cite the influx of women into managerial roles, the breakdown of community and even the decline of religion as contributing factors.
In a 2012 survey of government workers in NSW, almost half reported witnessing bullying in the workplace in the past 12 months, and 29 per cent had personally experienced it. More than one in five had submitted a formal complaint. (Those are especially high figures - about double the average international incidence, according to a recent review.) A 2012 federal parliament inquiry into workplace bullying estimated the cost to the Australian economy could be as high as $36 billion annually. That's not lunch money.
Here's another surprise: up to a third of the bad guys aren't guys at all. The question of why women workers mistreat other women - and how they do - generates strong opinions. But hard evidence remains thin.
Everybody secretly loves a catfight. Yet everybody fears it, too - probably because female aggression runs so counter to our stereotypes around feminine "niceness". When women have their claws out, blokes fear to tread. And other women run for cover too, instinctively protecting their flanks.
"Be honest," I urge Dr Sara Branch, an organisational psychologist and member of Griffith University's Workplace Bullying team. "Are women just bitchier?"
"I would say it's more complicated than that," she replies carefully. "It's not as simple as saying women are horrible to women. Bullying isn't just an interaction between two parties. It's the workplace environment, plus the two people, plus the bystanders."
That makes sense. Female workers still cluster in "pink ghetto" industries such as teaching, nursing and retail, or in woman-heavy departments such as human resources or publicity. So women simply have more opportunity for same-sex bullying.
There's another factor, too. Research shows that any single-gender-dominated workplace will be more prone to bullying compared to those with a balance of men and women. The average childcare centre is a battlefield; so too is the average mine site.
But it's when Branch points out that women are more likely to be bullied in both female- and male-dominated workplaces that I get confused.
At first, I think I misheard her. "Wait, are you saying women are just more likely to be bullied, full stop?"
"Well, yes," she replies.
Again, when you think about it, it makes sense. The least powerful people - whether on the school bus or in the boardroom - will always be the ones most vulnerable to abuse. And the research results are pretty clear on this one. While woman-to-woman bullying tends to get the press, overall "the vast majority of bullies are men", according to American psychologists Ruth and Gary Namie. Their 2014 US Workplace Bullying Survey found that 69 per cent of all perpetrators were male, and six out of 10 targets were female.
That doesn't prove women are nicer. In fact, the opposite position - that women really are hard-wired to scratch each other's eyes out, given half a chance - has support from some surprising quarters. Feminist theorist Phyllis Chesler, for example, argues that women are oppressed "not because men beat up on us but because we don't want to be shunned by our little cliques".
The author of the classic work Woman's Inhumanity to Woman, Chesler argues that "the feminist view that women are morally superior to men, are compassionate, nurturing, maternal and also very valiant under siege" is pure myth. In a nutshell, Chesler's take is simply that yes, girls are mean. Really, really mean. Not because they're female, necessarily. Because they're human.
But what about the oft-repeated view that "women are their own worst enemies"? Bullyblocking author Evelyn Field muses that "because of the lack of support for women within the higher echelons in industry everywhere, I suspect women are fighting women for the fewer jobs that are available to women". But, she concludes, "the basic fact, at the end of the day, is that men support men, but women don't support women. Whereas men do. Men will press the 'reset' button. Women take it personally. Women are more sensitive, more vulnerable and very nasty in a subtle way."
"But isn't that just a stereotype?" I prod. "I mean, isn't that simply the Mean Girls scenario that pop culture has led us to expect?" Field exhales, clearly impatient. "There's not a sisterhood," she repeats briskly.
And I get that. I'm sad about it, but I get it. What I don't get is the evidence that males are any less cutthroat or competitive. "Don't you ever watch Mad Men?" I want to ask her. "Or read the Bible, or Homer, or Shakespeare? Haven't you ever seen World Wide Wrestling, or Question Time?"
All bullying is a bid for power and control. But do female workplace bullies use different tactics to achieve their dastardly ends? Griffith University's Sara Branch explains there is a lack of direct data about perpetrators, who naturally enough "don't often put their hands up to be studied. What we do know from targets is that men are more open in their aggression, but women tend to use exclusion and tactics that embarrass the other person. They tend to be a little more covert."
"Tend to" is the key phrase here. Belinda L was bullied by a classic girl gang who dressed in matching, sexed-up corporate uniforms and even tried to dictate whom she could and couldn't have lunch with. But the majority of the women I talk to have been subjected to so-called "male-style" bullying by their female bosses.
Sheila K described her wrecking ball of a boss as someone who was simply "very powerful and very inclined to use power to intimidate", who would fix subordinates with a death stare, even in the hall or the lift.
Christina N described her female boss as "more aggressive-aggressive" and her male boss as more passive-aggressive. "Scott would say things behind your back, and say things to other people. But face to face, he'd be as nice as pie." It was the bloke who was the Mean Girl, in other words.
Gabrielle A's female boss also played against type, "going for me full-on, with both guns - and in an open-plan office". It was a volatile, deadline-driven workplace, Gabrielle concedes, and as a manager she'd had her own share of aggressive encounters with her mostly male colleagues. But these were "normal barneys" and quickly resolved. "Being blokes, it was black, white, done, over" and often ended in a laugh.
The contrast illustrates the difference between what researchers call "predatory" and "dispute-related" behaviour. The latter has a good chance of being resolved. In the former, you've basically got Buckley's. "All the training in the world will not help you if you just have a predator, who is just nasty," says Branch.
Evelyn Field is more optimistic about the predator's chances for rehabilitation. Yes, "their brains are different and their level of empathy is different. But they're not idiots. They know that if they don't change the way they work with other people that they're out of a job."
Experts agree that there's no such thing as a "typical" target of female bullying. Case in point: popular, powerful Network Ten broadcaster Sandra Sully, who was bullied relentlessly by a woman who was her subordinate. (The term for that, I learn, is "upward bullying" - and yes, it's a thing.)
"I was gobsmacked when I realised I'd been bullied," Sully told me. "I kept groping and grappling for the right way to describe this ongoing targeting, this vindictive behaviour that was aimed at me. In the last 10 years, people are like, 'Yes, well, you were being bullied.' " The bully's tactic - which turns out to be a classic manoeuvre - involved framing Sully as "the problem".
"Being a woman, and talent, it's just so easy to be perceived as being difficult," says Sully. "And that adds an extra level of complication to it all."
In Belinda L's workplace, an older, "victim-y" woman had been the first to be targeted. She would respond to taunts by breaking down in tears. In contrast, at age 28, funny, outspoken Belinda could not have been further from the office-doormat type.
But after a few months of being deliberately sidelined from meetings and conferences, she found her confidence dwindling. She could see herself transforming into a victim - and it scared the hell out of her.
Women who have been bullied, especially by other women, are less likely to resolve their workplace issues than to abandon them - by quitting their jobs, seeking redundancies or moving strategically sideways. (Perpetrators, on the other hand, generally stay put.) Managers are reluctant to get their hands dirty - and often for good reason. "He said/she said" is hard enough. But "she said/she said"? Forget about it.
"Any male CEO I've ever spoken to about this has said, 'Oh, you so don't want to go there as a bloke,' " says Sully. "Even female bosses have said, 'You just can't deal with a crying woman.' "
As a public-sector lawyer, Sheila K was routinely tasked with investigating bullying claims. The experience left her with a lot of sympathy for management. "There's this very long grey area of 'What is acceptable behaviour in the workplace?' - and, 'When does unacceptable behaviour amount to bullying?' "
For targets, she knows too well, lodging a formal complaint can be as stressful as the bullying itself. "It's not just a simple matter of making a complaint, yes or no. People have to give evidence against their workmates. Will you stand up and be counted? What are the consequences if you do? Will it be held against you? Will your career suffer? And don't forget, you've got to have corroborated evidence."
Sheila herself opted for a redundancy, for exactly these reasons. Gabrielle did pursue a claim and, while the settlement she received was "bugger-all really, considering I lost half a year's salary", the outcome was a symbolic vindication. But the impact on her life, professionally, socially and emotionally, has been devastating. She has moved overseas and is trying to rebuild. After 12 years with the one organisation, it's been tough. "You don't win," she told me. "You just don't. But it's not about the money. It's about putting a line under this and getting on with your life."
For the small percentage of targets who stay in their jobs, the challenge is all about putting energy into what they can control - their own responses - and leaving personalities and attitudes out of it.
In most cases, bullying isn't a personal problem. It's a cultural one. Some workplace cultures show zero tolerance. Others permit, or even implicitly invite, harassment and intimidation. In those cases, observes Belinda, "Management say they care about it, but once a bullying culture is set up, I've never seen anybody effectively change it."
Yet Belinda was able to turn the tables, with help from a counsellor who advised her to fight fire with fire. To shut her door, physically. To make new friends. To respond mockingly rather than meekly to verbal put-downs. To call out the bullying in public wherever possible. Victory came the day she looked her boss straight in the eye during a meeting and asked coolly, "Why are you rolling your eyes? Is there something funny about what I just said?" At that moment, she recalls, her tormentor "absolutely caved. After that, she had no power."
Looking back, Christina admits that her male colleagues stood their ground in a way that she was never able to manage. "The men were able to tell managers to back off, and they did. Maybe I was never as assertive or aggressive. But why do you have to be?"
Sandra Sully speaks for many when she says that if she had her time over again, she would call out bullies much, much sooner. She counts her failure to do so as one of the biggest mistakes of her career.
"It would have made my life so much easier if I just could have said, 'I'm being bullied. By this person. This is what they're doing.' It's a term that employers are finally starting to understand."





http://www.smh.com.au/good-weekend/ms-bully-20150709-gi8q2o.html